Privette Doctrine MSJ Victory for Property Owners Sued by Contractor's Employee
Sims, Lawrence & Broghammer’s Noah Hallam won his Motion for Summary Judgment in a case involving personal injury...

Noah W. Hallam
Attorney at Law

Sims, Lawrence & Broghammer’s Noah Hallam won his Motion for Summary Judgment in a case involving personal injury claims of an employee of a licensed contractor hired by the homeowner clients who was injured while performing work on the client’s property.
Plaintiff fell from a ladder while descending from the client’s roof as part of his work. Plaintiff argued that the ladder was a dangerous condition and not part of the work site. Attorney Hallam argued that Plaintiff’s claims were barred by the Privette Doctrine which provides that the hirer of a licensed contractor cannot be sued for any personal injuries sustained by that contractor’s employees while performing the work they were hired for unless the hirer affirmatively contributed to the injury.
The Verdict
The Court found that Plaintiff’s attempts to escape the Privette Doctrine were unsupported by California law and granted the MSJ in its entirety.
Past Articles

Favorable Federal Court Ruling on All Defense Positions
Motion for Leave to File Second Supplemental Complaint — DENIED

Eric T. Martinez
Attorney at Law

Defense Summary Judgment Victory Under the Privette Doctrine
Nicholas Des Rosier and Kayla Rosier v. Rocklin Motorsports Inc.

Daniel P. Costa
Partner

SLB Obtains Strong Result in Construction Arbitration
Bob Sims and Sean Speciale recently defended a AAA construction industry arbitration stemming from a single rain event during a roof replacement.

Sean M. Speciale
Attorney at Law
Privette Doctrine MSJ Victory for Property Owners Sued by Contractor's Employee
Sims, Lawrence & Broghammer’s Noah Hallam won his Motion for Summary Judgment in a case involving personal injury...

Noah W. Hallam
Attorney at Law

Sims, Lawrence & Broghammer’s Noah Hallam won his Motion for Summary Judgment in a case involving personal injury claims of an employee of a licensed contractor hired by the homeowner clients who was injured while performing work on the client’s property.
Plaintiff fell from a ladder while descending from the client’s roof as part of his work. Plaintiff argued that the ladder was a dangerous condition and not part of the work site. Attorney Hallam argued that Plaintiff’s claims were barred by the Privette Doctrine which provides that the hirer of a licensed contractor cannot be sued for any personal injuries sustained by that contractor’s employees while performing the work they were hired for unless the hirer affirmatively contributed to the injury.
The Verdict
The Court found that Plaintiff’s attempts to escape the Privette Doctrine were unsupported by California law and granted the MSJ in its entirety.
Past Articles

Favorable Federal Court Ruling on All Defense Positions
Motion for Leave to File Second Supplemental Complaint — DENIED

Eric T. Martinez
Attorney at Law

Defense Summary Judgment Victory Under the Privette Doctrine
Nicholas Des Rosier and Kayla Rosier v. Rocklin Motorsports Inc.

Daniel P. Costa
Partner

SLB Obtains Strong Result in Construction Arbitration
Bob Sims and Sean Speciale recently defended a AAA construction industry arbitration stemming from a single rain event during a roof replacement.

Sean M. Speciale
Attorney at Law
Privette Doctrine MSJ Victory for Property Owners Sued by Contractor's Employee
Sims, Lawrence & Broghammer’s Noah Hallam won his Motion for Summary Judgment in a case involving personal injury...

Noah W. Hallam
Attorney at Law

Sims, Lawrence & Broghammer’s Noah Hallam won his Motion for Summary Judgment in a case involving personal injury claims of an employee of a licensed contractor hired by the homeowner clients who was injured while performing work on the client’s property.
Plaintiff fell from a ladder while descending from the client’s roof as part of his work. Plaintiff argued that the ladder was a dangerous condition and not part of the work site. Attorney Hallam argued that Plaintiff’s claims were barred by the Privette Doctrine which provides that the hirer of a licensed contractor cannot be sued for any personal injuries sustained by that contractor’s employees while performing the work they were hired for unless the hirer affirmatively contributed to the injury.
The Verdict
The Court found that Plaintiff’s attempts to escape the Privette Doctrine were unsupported by California law and granted the MSJ in its entirety.
Past Articles

Favorable Federal Court Ruling on All Defense Positions
Motion for Leave to File Second Supplemental Complaint — DENIED

Eric T. Martinez
Attorney at Law

Defense Summary Judgment Victory Under the Privette Doctrine
Nicholas Des Rosier and Kayla Rosier v. Rocklin Motorsports Inc.

Daniel P. Costa
Partner

SLB Obtains Strong Result in Construction Arbitration
Bob Sims and Sean Speciale recently defended a AAA construction industry arbitration stemming from a single rain event during a roof replacement.

Sean M. Speciale
Attorney at Law